legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Manriques
Appellant Domingo Manriques appeals from his conviction and sentence of continuous sexual abuse of a child under the age of 14 years. (Pen. Code, § 288.5, subd. (a).) Before this court he claims that the lower court erred in failing to grant his motion to suppress evidence of incriminating statements he made during a police interview because he had invoked his right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436. Further, appellant contends that the trial court’s order that he submit to a blood test pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.1 is unlawful. As we shall explain, the evidence in the record supports the court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress his incriminatory statements to police and any error with respect to the blood testing order was harmless. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale