legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.V.
This is an appeal by S.L. (mother) from a juvenile court's order under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 366.26 terminating her parental rights to Jay.V., Jai.V., and G.W., who are three of five children removed from her custody due to physical abuse.[2] Mother contends that termination of parental rights is detrimental to the children under the sibling relationship exception to parental rights termination set out in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(v), and therefore the trial court erred when it terminated her parental rights. Mother also contends that she was deprived of effective assistance of trial counsel because her trial counsel did not raise the sibling exception at the hearing where parental rights were terminated. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale