BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF PATTERSON Part-II
Morrison Homes, Inc. (Developer) obtained a development agreement and tentative subdivision maps for the construction of two residential subdivisions in Patterson, California. At the time those documents were approved, the City of Patterson (City)[1] allowed developers to pay a fee of $734 per house in lieu of building affordable housing. About three years later, City increased this fee to $20,946 per house and sought to apply the increased fee to Developer's two residential projects among others.
Developer sued City claiming that the increased fee violated (1) its vested property rights, (2) its contractual rights under the development agreement, (3) various statutory provisions, and (4) constitutional provisions requiring voter approval of special taxes. The trial court found that the increased in-lieu fee was permitted under section 4.5(d)(ii) of the development agreement and the amount of the increase was reasonably justified. The court entered judgment accordingly, and Developer appealed.[2]
We will conclude that the meaning of the contractual term â€
Comments on BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF PATTERSON Part-II