A.M. v. Super. Ct.
This petition is brought by A.M. (Mother) challenging the trial court's termination of reunification services with respect to her son B.M. (Minor). Mother argues that the trial court erred when it found that real party in interest, the Department of Public Social Services (Department), had offered her reasonable and adequate services. We deny the petition.[1]
Comments on A.M. v. Super. Ct.