legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re F.S.
Appellant J.B. (mother) is the mother of F.S. and S.G. (the children).[1] Appellant L.G. (father) is the father of S.G. only. Mother and father (the parents) appeal the juvenile court's order terminating their parental rights. On appeal, mother claims that: 1) the beneficial relationship exception applied (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)[2]), and the juvenile court should have ordered a permanent plan of legal guardianship or long-term foster care; 2) the court erred in finding the children generally adoptable; and 3) the children's counsel had a conflict of interest in representing both children. Father filed a separate brief on appeal, joining in mother's arguments with regard to S.G. We affirm.[3]

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale