P. v. Morceli
Arguing erroneous admission of prejudicial evidence, Farid Morceli (defendant) seeks reversal of his conviction for stalking. (Pen. Code, § 646.9.)[1] Finding no error, we will affirm.

Comments on P. v. Morceli

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced