Domestic Partnership of Passmore and Dahl
This is an appeal by Michael L. Passmore (Passmore) from the judgment entered following a trial on his petition to dissolve his domestic partnership with Christian Dahl (Dahl) and distribute the partnership assets, if any. In that judgment the trial court found, among other things, that the parties had separated in June 2009, when Dahl moved out of the residence he and Passmore had shared since 1999; that 28 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the residence is an asset of the domestic partnership; and that 33 percent of Passmore's 401K is a domestic partnership asset. Passmore challenges those findings and also challenges the trial court's order (1) awarding the household furnishings to Dahl as his sole and separate property and (2) requiring Passmore to pay Dahl support of $300 per month for 18 months. Passmore also purports to challenge the trial court's postjudgment order denying his motion to recover attorney's fees from Dahl. We cannot address that issue because Passmore did not include it in his notice of appeal.[1]
We conclude Passmore's claims are meritless and therefore we will affirm.
Comments on Domestic Partnership of Passmore and Dahl