legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Mundkowsky
This marital dissolution case began in 2006. Since then appellant Hyeonjoo Mundkowsky (wife) and respondent Robert Mundkowsky (husband) have engaged in continuous, hard-fought litigation.[1] Over the last few years, the litigation has primarily related to husband's payment of child support to wife, and husband's involvement in the life of the couple's daughter, Elizabeth Mundkowsky.
We issued an unpublished opinion (Mundkowsky I) on August 20, 2010, which we shall discuss post. In this second appeal, wife challenges an order dated September 13, 2010, on numerous grounds. The order concerned various disputes between the parties regarding financial issues.
We shall conclude that wife did not meet her burden of showing the trial court committed reversible error. We do not reach the merits of most of wife's arguments because she failed to meet her obligations as an appellant.[2] Among other things, wife did not provide a sufficient appellate record, she did not present coherent and comprehensible arguments, and she did not preserve issues on appeal by asserting them below. We thus affirm the order dated September 13, 2010.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale