Berry v. Washington Mutual Bank
Ruby Berry appeals from the trial court's judgment, entered after the court granted defendant Washington Mutual Bank's (Bank) motion for summary adjudication regarding each of Berry's claims for race and age discrimination and racial and age harassment in employment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12900 et seq. (FEHA). Berry argues reversal is necessary because the trial court prejudicially applied the wrong legal analysis regarding her discrimination and age harassment claims, incorrectly found no triable issues of material fact regarding each of the claims, wrongly concluded Berry had not exhausted administrative remedies for her racial harassment claim, and incorrectly ruled she could not pursue punitive damages. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Berry v. Washington Mutual Bank