legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Steadfast Ins. Co. v. Gemini Ins. Co.
Respondent Steadfast Insurance Company (Steadfast) and appellant Gemini Insurance Company (Gemini) were successive insurers of Avanti Roofing Company, a roofing subcontractor (Avanti). A dispute arose between Steadfast and Gemini over amounts to be contributed toward settlement of a residential construction defect case. Gemini believed that the homeowners' settlement demand to Avanti was unreasonable and refused to contribute. As a result, Steadfast had to decide if it would go to trial and face the possibility of a significantly larger judgment, accept Gemini's offer and pay the difference to meet the demand, or pay the entire demand and seek equitable contribution from Gemini. It chose the latter course.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale