legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Arundel HOA v. Arundel Green Partners
The homeowners association (the HOA) of a 31-unit condominium complex known as The Arundel filed a complaint against Arundel Green Partners and related entities[1] (collectively, Arundel Green), alleging defective construction. The trial court granted Arundel Green's motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the HOA's entire complaint was barred by the 10-year statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15 (section 337.15). Thereafter, relying on Lantzy v. Centex Homes (2003) 31 Cal.4th 363 (Lantzy), the HOA brought motions for a new trial and to amend its complaint to allege additional facts establishing equitable estoppel.[2] The trial court denied the HOA's motions, finding â€

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale