P. v. Crear
Javario Crear was convicted of first degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon. He argues his confession was coerced and should have been excluded. He also contends that improperly admitted hearsay identified him as the perpetrator, and that the improper identification was compounded by prosecutorial misconduct. In addition, he argues the court wrongly barred him from impeaching an investigating officer with evidence of an unrelated, unspecified police disciplinary proceeding, and that the court should not have instructed the jury on flight as showing consciousness of guilt. None of these contentions is meritorious. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Crear