legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Arizmendi
A jury convicted defendant Alexander Burgos Arizmendi of possession of an assault weapon (count 1) and criminal threats (count 2) in a San Jose case and of possession of an assault weapon (count 4), negligent discharge of a firearm (count 5), and being under the influence of a controlled substance (count 3) in a Mountain View case. It also found true allegations that defendant personally used an assault weapon in committing counts 2 and 5 for purposes of a five-, six-, or 10-year sentence enhancement. The trial court sentenced defendant to 11 years and four months in prison. On appeal, defendant contends that (1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence of the assault weapon in the San Jose case, (2) the trial court transgressed his constitutional right to due process by consolidating the San Jose case with the Mountain View case, and (3) the convictions for possession of an assault weapon transgress his constitutional right to bear arms. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale