P. v. Abrifor
Oghenekaro Abrifor appeals from his conviction of sexual battery and misdemeanor simple battery. His only contention on appeal is that the mandatory sexual registration requirement imposed for sexual battery infringes on his right to privacy and therefore violates his constitutional rights to equal protection and substantive due process. Respondent contends the constitutional challenges have been forfeited because they were not raised at trial. Alternatively respondent contends there is no equal protection violation because persons convicted of sexual battery are not similarly situated to persons convicted of simple battery. Respondent also argues there is no due process violation because the registration requirement is not unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious. We find no equal protection or due process violation and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Abrifor