In re Z.M.
Two appeals are before this court. The first appeal is brought by Audrey M., who challenges the juvenile court's denial of a continuance before it terminated her parental rights to her daughter Z. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 352.)[1] The second appeal is brought by Gloria M., Z.'s maternal grandmother, who challenges the court's summary denial of her petition for a modification. (§ 388.) We find no abuse of discretion in either of the juvenile court's rulings and affirm.
Comments on In re Z.M.