legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Alyeshmerni v. MRRM LLC
Following the purchase of 18 vacant lots of real estate, the buyer sued the seller, contending that the seller should have disclosed an alleged property line dispute along the southern boundary of the property. Following a bench trial, the trial court denied the plaintiff buyer's claim for rescission and other causes of action.
In this appeal, our review is limited due to the plaintiff's failure to properly request and obtain a statement of decision. Since substantial evidence supports denial of the rescission claim, we affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale