legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Julie D. v. Superior Court
Petitioner Julie D., the mother of 15-month-old J.D.-M., seeks extraordinary writ review of a juvenile court order entered at the conclusion of a contested six-month review hearing on family reunification.[1] (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.400(2), 8.452.) The court terminated mother's reunification services and set the matter for a hearing on October 26, 2011, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[2] to determine the child's permanent placement. Mother contends that the trial court erred in finding that the San Francisco County Human Services Agency (agency) provided her with reasonable reunification services. She also claims the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to order additional services for her. We disagree, and deny the requested relief.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale