legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.D.
D.D. appeals a juvenile court order denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1] in which she requested the court modify previous orders. She also appeals an order under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(3) that efforts be made to find an appropriate adoptive home for her son, L.D. She argues the court abused its discretion by denying her section 388 petition, and substantial evidence did not support the court's finding the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption and termination of parental rights of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) did not apply to preclude terminating parental rights. The San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) maintains D.D's appeal from the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(3) order is premature.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale