legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Warren v. Carroll
Jerry D. Carroll (Carroll) appeals from a judgment entered after a court trial. He contends the court erred in ruling that respondents had acquired a prescriptive easement to the portion of a driveway that is on his property, because respondents did not prove the elements required for the acquisition of a prescriptive easement and, even if they had, he proved that he extinguished the easement by placing a chain across the driveway. We will affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale