legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Zachary S. v. Superior Court
Zachary S. and L.S. (together, the parents) seek writ review of juvenile court orders terminating their reunification services regarding their daughter, Brenna S., and setting a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Zachary contends the court erred by terminating reunification services because there was a substantial probability Brenna would be returned to parental care by the 18-month date; substantial evidence does not support the finding reasonable reunification services were provided; and the court abused its discretion by suspending visitation without a finding of detriment and by delegating discretion to the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) to decide whether to reinstate visitation. L.S. joins Zachary's arguments. We deny the petitions. We vacate the stay of the section 366.26 hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale