legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re B.A.
J.M., mother of minor children K.M. and B.A., and C.A., the alleged father of B.A., appeal from the juvenile court's orders terminating their parental rights and setting adoption as the permanent plan for the children. Appellants argue the orders must be reversed because there was not clear and convincing evidence that the children were likely to be adopted within a reasonable time and the assessment report by the San Francisco Human Services Agency (Agency) was insufficient. C.A. also argues for reversal of the order regarding B.A. because the court erroneously failed to rule on his request for a judgment of parentage and denied him the opportunity to cross-examine a testifying social worker regarding the children's adoptability, and requests certain orders should we reverse and remand. We affirm the orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale