In re J.W.
J.W. (father) appeals from orders entered in the dependency case filed on behalf of J.W. (minor). Father contends: (1) unspecified orders should be reversed on the grounds that the Department of Children and Family Services (Department) did not provide the notice required by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA); and (2) the juvenile court erred when it denied his petition under section 388 of the Welfare and Institutions Code[1] seeking six months of reunification services.
Comments on In re J.W.