I.F. v. Superior Court
In this case, we review an order of the trial court denying reunification services to I.F. (Father) and J.L. (Mother). The trial court denied services on the basis that Mother and Father[1] had caused severe harm to N., that N.'s two half-siblings were therefore also at risk, and that it would not benefit the children to offer services. (Welf. & Inst. Code,[2] §§ 300, subd. (e), 361.5, subd. (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7).)[3] Mother challenges the order with respect to the half-siblings of N., E., and D. Father challenges it with respect to his natural child, D.
Comments on I.F. v. Superior Court