P. v. Neblung
A jury convicted defendant James Evan Neblung of committing continuous sexual abuse of a child under the age of 14 years. (Pen. Code, § 288.5, subd. (a).)[1] The trial court sentenced defendant to six years in state prison.
On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in modifying CALCRIM No. 1120, which defines acts of substantial sexual conduct upon which a conviction of continuous sexual abuse may be based. Specifically, defendant argues that the trial court misinstructed that masturbation constitutes substantial sexual conduct if it involves any touching of the victim's or perpetrator's genitals â€
Comments on P. v. Neblung