P. v. Osuna
We affirm appellant Martin Osuna's conviction for selling a controlled substance and offering to sell a controlled substance. Osuna filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), and after review of the entire record, we find no arguable issue.
We also affirm appellant Rafael Perez's conviction for offering to sell a controlled substance. We find no merit to Perez's challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence or the trial court's instruction regarding flight from the scene. We agree with Perez that his conduct credits should be amended and modify the judgment accordingly.
Comments on P. v. Osuna