Charter v. Homem
After a bench trial in this mortgage and foreclosure dispute, a deed executed in favor of respondent Richard T. Homem was rescinded and title to real property was returned to appellant Lisa Charter. The trial court rejected her cause of action for damages under the Mortgage Foreclosure Consultant Act (MFCA). (Civ. Code,[1] § 2945 et seq.) Charter appeals, contending that the trial court erred when it found that (1) usury laws did not apply to this matter and (2) Homem did not act as a foreclosure consultant. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Charter v. Homem