In re Logan S.
This appeal has been taken by Stacey W. and Paul M., the parents of the minor Logan, from a judgment pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 that terminated their parental rights and ordered adoption as the permanent plan.[1] They claim that the juvenile court erred by failing to find that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption preference (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) is applicable. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion by terminating parental rights and ordering adoption as a permanent plan for the minor, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re Logan S.