In re Jasmine V.
In this dependency matter (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 et seq.),[1] the mother of the six dependent children in the case challenges the termination of her parental rights to five of those children. The father of five of the children has also appealed. He does not contend that error was committed when his own parental rights were terminated. Rather, he has joined in the mother's contentions and arguments respecting the termination of her parental rights to the extent those contentions and arguments inure to his benefit, and he contends that if her parental rights are reinstated then his parental rights must also be reinstated. The petitioner in the case, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (the Department), contends that both parents have failed to present a convincing argument for relief.
The appeal presents the question whether the Department provided proper section 366.26 notice to the mother for termination of her parental rights. Our review of the appellate record convinces us that notice was proper. Therefore, the terminating order will be affirmed.
Comments on In re Jasmine V.