Marr. of Carlson and Decker-Carlson
Stephanie Decker-Carlson appeals from the order denying her motion to set aside the parties' marital settlement agreement and the judgment incorporating that agreement. She argues that the settlement agreement and judgment should have been set aside based on mistake (Fam. Code, § 2122, subd. (e)),[1] because she learned after the parties settled the matter that respondent Eric Carlson's employee stock options, which were awarded solely to him, were more valuable than he had previously disclosed. Finding no abuse of discretion, Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on Marr. of Carlson and Decker-Carlson