legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Frasier
A jury found defendant and appellant Shannon Dale Frasier guilty of two counts of aggravated sexual assault upon a child under 14 years of age and 7 or more years younger than defendant (Pen. Code, §§ 269, subd. (a), 289, subd. (a))[1] (counts 1 & 2) and four counts of forcible lewd acts upon a child under the age of 14 years (§ 288, subd. (b)(1)) (counts 3-6). Defendant was sentenced to a total indeterminate term of 30 years to life, and a total determinate term of 32 years with credit for time served.
On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements elicited from him just prior to his arrest absent any Miranda[2] advisements; (2) the trial court erred in failing to sua sponte instruct the jury on the lesser offense of nonforcible sexual penetration of a child under 14 to the charged offense alleged in counts 1 and 2; (3) the trial court erred in imposing a $60,000 restitution fine and a $60,000 parole revocation fine. We agree with the parties that the trial court erred in imposing the fines in the amount of $60,000 and will modify the judgment accordingly. Court reject defendant's remaining contentions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale