P. v. Myrie
Defendants, Stollmeyer Myrie, Reginald Ward and Kirk Powell, appeal from their convictions for marijuana possession for purposes of sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359.) Mr. Ward was also convicted of transporting marijuana. (Health & Saf. Code § 11360, subd. (a).) Mr. Ward argues the trial court improperly: denied his suppression of evidence motion; failed to excuse a juror; and instructed the jurors with a modified version of CALCRIM No. 372. Mr. Myrie argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and the trial court improperly admitted evidence of his prior offenses. All defendants argue that they are entitled to additional presentence conduct credits pursuant to Penal Code[1] section 4019. Mr. Ward and Mr. Powell join in the arguments of their codefendants where they accrue to their benefit. Court affirm the judgments with modifications.
Comments on P. v. Myrie