P. v. Salazar
Defendant Craig Peter Salazar (appellant) pled no contest to assault with a firearm and admitted a firearm use enhancement. The trial court sentenced him to a six-year prison term. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by not giving reasons for its sentencing choice and because the court did not recognize it had discretion to impose a mitigated prison term without finding mitigating facts. Court reject his contentions and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Salazar