legal news


Register | Forgot Password

C.C. v. Superior Court
C.C. (Mother) challenges an order of the Solano County Superior Court, Juvenile Division, entered August 13, 2010, in which the court set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 366.26, to select a permanent plan for the minors D.J. (born November 2003), K.J. (born September 2005), and P.C. (born July 2009). She claims the juvenile court erred when it found that the Solano County Department of Child Welfare Services (Department) offered or provided her with reasonable services. As discussed below, we conclude the finding is supported by substantial evidence and deny the petition on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale