In re D.L.
Stephanie G. (mother) appeals from the judgment of June 9, 2010, terminating parental rights to D.L. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Mother contends the dependency court abused its discretion in denying her a continuance of the hearing to obtain a bonding study and in finding that termination of parental rights would not be detrimental to D. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re D.L.