P. v. Hager
Joseph Toliver Hager appeals his conviction of attempted murder and shooting at an occupied vehicle. He argues that (1) the court under the guise of asking clarifying questions became an advocate for the prosecution; (2) gang expert testimony was improperly admitted; and (3) a pretrial six-pack photographic lineup (six-pack) identification was unduly suggestive in violation of his right to due process. None of his contentions has merit. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hager