P. v. Galvan
Carlos Galvan appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of carjacking, one count of assault with a semiautomatic firearm, and one count of evading a peace officer and the trial court sentenced him to prison for 20 years 8 months.
Galvan argues his firearm assault conviction must be reversed because the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte that guilt under Penal Code section 245, subdivision (b) required their finding that the firearm was a semiautomatic, as alleged in the information, and in failing to define the term â€
Comments on P. v. Galvan