P. v. Sweet
Appellant Clinton Sweet, Jr., appeals from an order denying his motion to recalculate his presentence custody credits. Appellant's counsel on appeal has filed an opening brief that asks this court to conduct an independent review of the record as is required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Counsel also informed appellant that he had the right to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf. Appellant declined to exercise that right.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of petty theft with a prior. (Pen. Code, § 666.)[1] On March 25, 2009, the court sentenced him to two years in prison. As is relevant here, the court granted appellant 214 days actual credit plus 106 days conduct credit for a total of 320 days.
Comments on P. v. Sweet