P. v. Rudolph
Appellant Marshall Timothy Rudolph contends that the trial court violated his federal constitutional right to due process when it imposed vague and overbroad probation conditions, including prohibiting him from being in the presence of minors and ordering him to submit to polygraph examinations. Court conclude that the probation condition regarding appellant being in the presence of minors is overly broad and must be narrowed in order to avoid constitutional infirmity. Otherwise, Court find no merit in appellant's arguments. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to correct the minute order and modify the challenged probation conditions, and affirm the judgment (order granting probation) as modified.
Comments on P. v. Rudolph