legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Solorzano
Edgar Rene Solorzano appeals from the judgment entered upon his convictions by jury of rape by drugs (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(3), count 1)[1] and sexual penetration by foreign object (§ 289, subd. (e), count 4). The trial court sentenced him to an aggregate prison term of eight years. Appellant contends that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions, (2) the trial court erred (a) in allowing the admission of evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct, thereby depriving him of his rights to due process and a fair trial, (b) in refusing to allow the defense a full and fair cross-examination of the victim's history of alcohol consumption, thereby depriving him of his constitutional rights to confront the witnesses against him, present a defense, due process and a fair trial, and (c) in excluding two defense witnesses, depriving appellant of his rights to present a defense, assistance of counsel, due process and a fair trial, and (3) execution of sentence on count 4 should be stayed pursuant to section 654.
Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale