Yanik v. Tascian
Plaintiff and appellant Ardas Yanik appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Penik Ben Tascian (the Administrator), as the administrator of the estate of Dogan Levon Tasciyan, in this action to recover money on a contract related to the sale of property. The trial court found that Yanik was not entitled to compensation, because he participated in the negotiations of the purchase agreement between Tasciyan and a third party without being licensed as a real estate broker or salesperson. Yanik contends the court's finding is not supported by substantial evidence. Court conclude substantial evidence supports the court's finding, and therefore, Court affirm.[
Comments on Yanik v. Tascian