P. v. Brown
Defendant Robert Harold Brown appeals from a judgment of conviction following his no contest plea to forging a driver's license and checks. Counsel for defendant has filed an opening brief that states the case and facts but raises no issues. (See People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant, as he is entitled to do, filed his own letter brief. We have, as required by Wende and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124, set forth herein the facts, the procedural background (including a description of the crimes of which defendant was convicted), and the disposition of defendant's case; reviewed the entire relevant record; and considered defendant's arguments.
Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Brown