P. v. Patterson
James Pablo Patterson appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him on three counts of second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)[1] He contends his conviction must be reversed because (1) the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of his prior contacts with the police, (2) the court erred when it admitted evidence that he committed an uncharged robbery, (3) the court erred when it refused to sever the trial of one of the counts that had been charged, and (4) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Court conclude no prejudicial errors were committed at appellant's trial and will affirm.
Comments on P. v. Patterson