legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Estate of Wisner
Petitioner, Ronald G. Osband (Ronald),[1] petitioned the probate court for an order directing respondent, Jeannette Raypholtz (Raypholtz), to return certain funds and personal property to petitioner as the personal representative of decedent, John L. Wisner. Petitioner alleged that, prior to decedent's death; forged documents were used to name Raypholtz as beneficiary of some of decedent's investment accounts. Additionally, certain transfers of funds from one of decedent's bank or investment accounts to another were made or attempted, based on documents bearing allegedly forged signatures. The petition also alleged decedent's signatures on certificates of title to his automobiles, transferring them to Raypholtz as a gift, were not genuine. Petitioner sought an order requiring Raypholtz to return the assets to the probate estate. After a 10-day trial, the court denied the petition, finding that the challenged transactions were carried out with the knowledge and at the direction of the decedent, the signatures were not forged, and the transactions were not the result of undue influence exerted on decedent. Petitioner appeals. Court find no error and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale