legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Resendiz
Defendant Jose Enrique Resendiz appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of first degree murder with the special circumstance that the murder was committed while defendant was an active participant in a criminal street gang and that the murder was carried out to further the gang's activities. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 190.2, subd. (a)(22).)[1] The jury also found true the allegation that defendant committed the murder for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (Former § 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) In addition, the jury found that defendant personally used a firearm, intentionally discharged a firearm, and intentionally discharged a firearm causing death (§ 12022.53, subds. (b)-(d)). The trial court sentenced defendant to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole consecutive to a term of 25 years to life. On appeal, defendant raises issues relating to the cross-examination of a witness, the admissibility of evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and jury instructions. We conclude the trial court erred in instructing the jury regarding an element of the special circumstance (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(22)) and the gang enhancement (former § 186.22, subd. (b)(1)) findings. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded for retrial of these findings. If the prosecutor elects not to retry the matter, the trial court shall resentence defendant.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale