legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Kostendenous
This is an appeal pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).
Defendant Satnam Sadu Kostendenous pleaded no contest to possession of concentrated cannabis, and the trial court granted him Proposition 36 probation, and reinstated him on probation in a trailing misdemeanor case. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (a).) He was given no time credits on this case, because the time was credited to his misdemeanor case, in an amount that was to be determined later.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale