legal news


Register | Forgot Password

S.D. v. Superior court
S.D. (petitioner), the mother of M.D. (the minor), seeks an extraordinary writ to vacate the orders of the juvenile court terminating reunification services and setting a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452.)[2] Petitioner raises numerous contentions but, for the most part, has failed to support these with legal authority. We reject her contentions on this basis, with the exception of her claim that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile courts finding that she had not made substantive progress in reunification services. As this claim is resolved predominantly by a review of the facts, which petitioner has cited in her petition, Court reach the merits of this claim, albeit adversely to her. Accordingly, Court shall deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale