legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brooks
This matter involves a consolidated appeal and petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the denial of a motion to suppress filed by appellant Douglas Gerard Brooks pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, and the effectiveness of assistance he received from counsel in connection with that motion.[1] Following denial of his motion, appellant pled no contest to transportation of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11379, subdivision (a), and admitted a prior conviction under Health and Safety Code section 11370.2. Appellant thereafter received a six-year prison sentence and was committed to the California Rehabilitation Center. For reasons set forth below, we conclude that appellants petition for writ of habeas corpus has merit, and thus that we must remand this matter to the trial court to ensure he receives effective assistance of counsel in connection with his suppression motion.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale