Fullerton Med. Group v. Sideman & Bancroft
Court reverse the judgment for two reasons. Court conclude that Sidemans objections to Fullerton Medicals expert declaration went more properly to its weight than its admissibility. Moreover, Sidemans showing in support of its summary adjudication motion was not sufficient to shift the burden of producing evidence to Fullerton Medical to show antitrust injury in the relevant product and geographic markets. After liberally construing the declaration in favor of Fullerton Medical as we must for the party opposing summary adjudication, Court conclude that Fullerton Medicals showing was sufficient to establish a triable issue of material fact with regard to the validity of the antitrust claim. Thus, summary judgment was improper and the judgment is reversed.
Comments on Fullerton Med. Group v. Sideman & Bancroft