P. v. Tucker
After defendant entered a no contest plea to failure to annually update his sex offender registration (Pen. Code, 290, subd. (a)(1)(D)),[1] he was placed on probation on the condition, among others, that he not be in the presence of children without the supervision of another adult. In this appeal, he claims that the probation condition is invalid and impermissibly vague. We conclude that the probation condition is reasonably related to deterring criminality, but is vague for failure to include a knowledge requirement. Court therefore modify the condition to correct vagueness elements in it, and otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Tucker