Freedman v. Roberts
Cross-defendant and appellant Kenneth Roberts appeals from a judgment in favor of cross-complainants and respondents Robert Freedman, R.F.F., Inc., and R.F.F. Family Partnership, L.P., in this action for implied contractual indemnity. Roberts contends that the judgment must be reversed, because there is no evidence he was liable to the injured third parties in the underlying action. Court agree and reverse.
Comments on Freedman v. Roberts